Welcome to the website for the Law Office of Jenna Rouse. I am a Workers' Compensation defense attorney. For more than 20 years I have defended carriers and self-insured employers primarily in Redding, Chico, Marysville, and Eureka. I am available to travel throughout the State of California, which currently has 24 DWC office locations.
My mission is to resolve cases in the fastest reasonable manner possible. I have extensive experience in all phases of case handling from the onset of claims through trials and appeals. I have substantial litigation and negotiation experience. I built my reputation for tenaciously working towards quick closures on my cases with agreeable results for my clients.
My mission is to resolve cases in the fastest reasonable manner possible. I have extensive experience in all phases of case handling from the onset of claims through trials and appeals. I have substantial litigation and negotiation experience. I built my reputation for tenaciously working towards quick closures on my cases with agreeable results for my clients.
Services
Jenna Rouse grew up in the Bay Area. She attended college in Pennsylvania at Grove City College where she graduated with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Business Administration in 1984. She received her Juris Doctor Degree from Santa Clara University in 1989. She was admitted to practice law in California in 1989.
I provide full case handling from the onset of claims through trials and appeals on Workers' Compensation defense cases. I am also available for short term assignments such as attending hearings, taking depositions, preparing settlements, walking settlements through at the WCAB, and obtaining DEU ratings.
104 week rule: Unless one of the exceptions of LC § 4656(c)(3) applies, the exposure for TD ends after 104 weeks from the commencement of TD for injuries occurring 4/19/04 through 12/31/07. For injuries on or after 1/1/08, the 104 aggregate weeks of TD can be payable throughout the 5 years from the date of injury.
The 3rd Appellate District certified this Arthur Cannon case for publication on 1/15/14 (#CO7294479). The 6th District in Guzman III suggested a departure from the strict application of the AMA Guides should occur only to accommodate complex or extraordinary cases. The 3rd District in Cannon addressed the "complex or extraordinary" issue.
The main lessons found in Ogilvie II and the later cases of Noriega Garcia, Jon Shini and Albert Hudsonare that we need to determine the relevant period of lost earnings and the reasons the injured work has lost earnings. The mechanical application of the Ogilvie formula is not a sufficient evidence for rebutting the prima facie evidence of the diminished future earning capacity (DFEC).2.
Reviews
Be the first to review Rouse Jenna Law.
Write a Review
