Joe Winston is an appellate lawyer located in Richmond, Virginia. He is available for consultation or referral regarding appeals in civil as well as criminal cases in both state and Federal courts. He is dedicated to providing superior value by making quality appellate advocacy available in a timely, flexible and cost-effective manner.
In his more than 30 years of practice, he has handled hundreds of appeals and argued before the Supreme Court of the United States. The best way to contact him is to call 804-364-8808 to schedule a visit at his office.
In his more than 30 years of practice, he has handled hundreds of appeals and argued before the Supreme Court of the United States. The best way to contact him is to call 804-364-8808 to schedule a visit at his office.
Services
Joe deals with a wide variety of constitutional, statutory and common-law issues as he represents clients in civil matters as well as in all types of criminal appeals. He assists clients with personal injury and insurance matters, as well as commercial litigation. Joe practices in the Virginia and Federal appellate courts.
I have more than 30 years of civil and criminal litigation experience, and have briefed and argued hundreds of appeals, including both petitions for review and merits cases. The extent of my experience has made me efficient at identifying the winning and losing issues. It has also given me a breadth of knowledge of the procedural issues that routinely come up.
Winston v. Lee, 470 U. S. 753 (1985) (upholding federal injunction of state prosecutor from surgical search for evidence as violative of the Fourth Amendment). Snyder v. George Washington University, 890 A.2d 237 D. C. App.
2006) (reversing dismissal of medical malpractice action because doctor's testimony established the national standard of care and a breach of that standard, and because the doctor's improperly-excluded testimony adequately established causation).Mr. Winston is not admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and appeared pro hac vice.
2006) (reversing dismissal of medical malpractice action because doctor's testimony established the national standard of care and a breach of that standard, and because the doctor's improperly-excluded testimony adequately established causation).Mr. Winston is not admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and appeared pro hac vice.
Reviews
Be the first to review J Winston.
Write a Review
